Republican party has always anointed itself as the party of fiscal responsibility and the champions of economic growth and prosperity. They've painted themselves as the party willing to tightened belts and balanced budgets while portraying Democrats as reckless spenders with a tendency for economic chaos. The data however, tells a very different yet truthful story exposing a carefully crafted lie that has been perpetrated for decades!
Democrats Historically Lead on the Economy
Let's cut through the spin and look at the numbers...
- GDP Growth
- Since WWII, real GDP growth has averaged 4.35% under Democrats compared to 2.54% under Republicans.
- Job Creation
- Democrats have overseen 2.5% annual job growth while Republicans lag behind at just over 1%.
- Recessions
- Of the 11 recessions in the modern era, 10 of them began under Republican administrations.
- Stock Market Performance
- The S&P 500 - returned 8.4% annually under Democrats compared to 2.7% under Republicans
- The DJIA - returned 11.45% annually under Democrats compared to 6.03% under Republicans
- The Nasdaq Composite - has returned 17.3% annually under Democrats compared to 12.87% under Republicans
The "Trickle-Down" Mirage
Another fairy tale of Republican fiscal "wisdom" comes from (or rather stolen from) the Ronald Reagan's "trickle-down" or supply-side economics. The theory promised that tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations would spur investment, create jobs, and ultimately benefit everyone. In practice, it led to ballooning deficits and increased income inequality. Instead of investing, the wealthy stash that money they saved from tax cuts offshore instead of pumping it back into the economy. The corporations use the money they save in the tax cuts to buy back more of their tock instead of investing in more workers, services, and means of production. Instead of acknowledging this, Republicans simply point to how well the country was doing under Reagan and use that façade to justify their continued push of these policies. What really happened was more base don the economic climate of the time rather than a policy that would produce sustainable results. Taxes are now so low that the effects his tax cuts had in the 80s can't work in today's economic conditions. If they are attempted, the results are short lasting and subjected to diminishing returns.
Debt Contribution by Party (1945-2025)
- Democratic Party
- Total % Increase of 200% and an Average % Increase Per Year of 4.5%
- Republican Party
- Total % Increase of 400% and an Average % Increase Per Year of 11.1%
- Implement Tax Cuts and Deregulate - Primarily benefiting the wealthy and corporations, leading to reduced federal revenue and less rules in place to keep corporate institutions from exploiting consumers
- Increase Spending - Often on defense and other priorities without offsetting the lost revenue
- Balloon the Deficit - As a result of the above policies, this contributes to recession
- Blame Democrats - When Democrats take office and attempt to address the fiscal mess, they're labeled as "tax-and-spend liberals"
- Rinse and Repeat
- Clinton Era - Achieved budget surpluses through a combination of tax increases and spending restraints
- Obama Administration - Implemented the Affordable Care Act and other measures aimed at reducing long-term deficits
- Biden Administration - Focused on infrastructure and social programs with proposed tax increases on the wealthy to fund them
No comments:
Post a Comment